CT-TAE vs. CT-TAS – Automation Duel or Power Duo?
โ๐๐ฌ๐งโ๐ญ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ข๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ง๐ข๐จ๐ซ ๐ญ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ฌ?โ
ย We heard this question more times than we can count.
But if youโre working in test automation, building frameworks, leading QA initiatives, or trying to prove the ROI of what you automate…
Thereโs an entire advanced layer built specifically for experienced professionals:
๐๐-๐๐๐ (๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐๐ซ) โ for those engineering maintainable, integrated, resilient test automation solutions.
๐๐-๐๐๐ (๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐๐ ๐ฒ) โ for those designing organization-wide strategies that connect automation with real business value.
These arenโt entry-level certificates. Theyโre about:
– Thinking beyond tools and scripts;
– Designing automation like systems engineers;
– Making strategic decisions that survive team changes, tool fatigue, and budget cuts.
Because at a certain point, Itโs not about collecting certifications โ itโs about sharpening the way we think about automation.
So no, ISTQB isnโt just for beginners.
Itโs for people whoโve written many lines of test code and now ask:
โ๐๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ธ๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐ถ๐ช๐ญ๐ฅ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ณ๐ช๐จ๐ฉ๐ต ๐ต๐ฉ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ช๐ฏ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ณ๐ช๐จ๐ฉ๐ต ๐ธ๐ข๐บ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐ฆ๐ด ๐ช๐ต ๐ข๐ค๐ต๐ถ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ต๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ?โ
Which path is right for you โ tactical (CT-TAE) or strategic (CT-TAS)?